Chickasaw vs Nepalese Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Nepalese
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Chickasaw
Nepalese
19.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
3.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
224th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Nepalese Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,816,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 19.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,516,782 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.310 and weighted average of 18.0%, a difference of 10.0%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Nepalese |
Minimum | 3.3% | 0.48% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 48.5% |
Range | 96.7% | 48.0% |
Mean | 27.0% | 19.8% |
Median | 23.7% | 18.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.1% | 14.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.0% | 24.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.9% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.5% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.4% | 10.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Cherokee (19.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Jamaican (20.0%, a difference of 0.74%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.6% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |
Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 19.9% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.0% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.0% |
Demographics Similar to Nepalese by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Inupiat (18.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Cuban (17.9%, a difference of 0.47%), Pennsylvania German (17.9%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Africa (18.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and Bermudan (18.1%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Japanese | 5.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.7% |
Iraqis | 5.5 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 5.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 5.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.3 /100 | #221 | Tragic 17.9% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 3.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 17.9% |
Cubans | 3.8 /100 | #223 | Tragic 17.9% |
Nepalese | 3.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.0% |
Inupiat | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.2 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 1.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.3% |
Fijians | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.3% |
Nicaraguans | 1.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.4% |