Chickasaw vs Jamaican Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,816,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 19.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 362,890,024 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.069 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 0.74%.

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Cherokee (19.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (19.7%, a difference of 0.78%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Subsaharan African (20.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Barbados (20.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from West Indies (20.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.38%).