Cape Verdean vs Immigrants from Jamaica Poverty
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Immigrants from Jamaica
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Immigrants from Jamaica
14.4%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cape Verdean vs Immigrants from Jamaica Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,560,730 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.142 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,608,738 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 0.62%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cape Verdean | Immigrants from Jamaica |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 5.2% |
| Maximum | 32.5% | 55.6% |
| Range | 29.6% | 50.4% |
| Mean | 14.2% | 14.9% |
| Median | 13.0% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 15.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Cape Verdeans and Immigrants from Jamaica by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Cherokee (14.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Liberia (14.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jamaica are Jamaican (14.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Guyana (14.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Guyanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Liberia (14.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and Cherokee (14.4%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |