Bermudan vs Iroquois Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bermudan
Iroquois
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Bermudans
Iroquois
5.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
52.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
13.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bermudan vs Iroquois Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,613,061 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.202 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,259,155 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.297 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 5.9%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bermudan | Iroquois |
Minimum | 0.39% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 18.5% | 22.9% |
Range | 18.1% | 21.3% |
Mean | 5.3% | 7.4% |
Median | 4.9% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 9.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 4.2% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bermudans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Ottawa (5.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Alsatian (5.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Uganda (5.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 51.3 /100 | #172 | Average 5.2% |
Alsatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.2% |
Marshallese | 47.9 /100 | #175 | Average 5.2% |
Menominee | 47.8 /100 | #176 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 45.1 /100 | #177 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Liberia (5.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Armenian (5.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Thailand (5.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Nigerian (5.5%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 13.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.5% |
Iroquois | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.5% |
Armenians | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.5% |
Potawatomi | 12.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 5.5% |
Afghans | 11.2 /100 | #218 | Poor 5.5% |
Japanese | 9.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.6% |
Colombians | 9.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.6% |
Panamanians | 9.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.6% |