Barbadian vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Barbadian
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Barbadians
Immigrants from Oceania
6.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
79.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Barbadian vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,186,778 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,351,716 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.803 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 20.2%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Barbadian | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 13.3% | 29.1% |
| Range | 12.9% | 27.9% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 7.9% |
| Median | 6.1% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 5.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Barbadians by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are U.S. Virgin Islander (6.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Jamaica (6.2%, a difference of 0.37%), Spanish American Indian (6.2%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Barbados (6.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.58%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.1% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.2% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |