Barbadian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Barbadian
Guamanian/Chamorro
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Barbadians
Guamanians/Chamorros
6.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
86.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Barbadian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,986,203 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,186,731 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 27.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Barbadian | Guamanian/Chamorro |
Minimum | 0.52% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 15.7% | 43.5% |
Range | 15.2% | 42.0% |
Mean | 6.0% | 8.7% |
Median | 5.5% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 6.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 10.3% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Barbadians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are Colville (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Choctaw (6.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Yaqui (6.3%, a difference of 0.62%), Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (6.2%, a difference of 0.83%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Chilean (4.9%, a difference of 0.13%), German Russian (5.0%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Portugal (5.0%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from China (5.0%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Soviet Union | 90.7 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 90.5 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.4 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 90.2 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Samoans | 90.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 89.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 4.9% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #136 | Excellent 4.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |