Apache vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Apache
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Apache
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
11.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
14.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
82.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Apache vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,777,431 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Apache and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,693,810 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 11.8%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Apache | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.74% |
Maximum | 41.5% | 37.5% |
Range | 40.0% | 36.8% |
Mean | 15.6% | 7.2% |
Median | 12.2% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.2% | 8.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.5% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 6.1% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Apache by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Pennsylvania German (11.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Crow (11.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Sierra Leonean (11.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (11.0%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |
Guatemalans | 16.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.0% |
Somalis | 15.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.0% |
Sierra Leoneans | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 15.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.0% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 15.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.0% |
Apache | 14.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.0% |
Crow | 14.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 12.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 11.1% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 12.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 11.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 10.6 /100 | #215 | Poor 11.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 10.6 /100 | #216 | Poor 11.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 10.2 /100 | #217 | Poor 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |