Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Subsaharan African Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Subsaharan African
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Sub-Saharan Africans
10.0%
MALE POVERTY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Subsaharan African Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,424,226 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,378,936 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.706 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 32.3%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 0.44% | 0.81% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 49.6% | 99.2% |
Mean | 11.2% | 20.0% |
Median | 9.2% | 13.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 19.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 17.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 17.0% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Asian (10.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Croatia (10.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Austria (10.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Slovene (10.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Turks | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 98.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 98.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Asians | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Germans | 98.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Estonians | 98.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Ukrainians | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jamaica (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Guyana (13.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Guyanese (13.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Jamaican (13.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and Iroquois (13.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |