Australian vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income
COMPARE
Australian
Chickasaw
Per Capita Income
Per Capita Income Comparison
Australians
Chickasaw
$52,074
PER CAPITA INCOME
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
$36,475
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,126,696 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Australians and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.262 and weighted average of $52,074. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,791 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of $36,475, a difference of 42.8%.
Per Capita Income Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Australian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | $23,081 | $10,758 |
| Maximum | $105,254 | $42,047 |
| Range | $82,173 | $31,289 |
| Mean | $49,891 | $28,009 |
| Median | $48,296 | $27,826 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $34,284 | $24,362 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $60,948 | $31,977 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | $26,664 | $7,616 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | $19,453 | $5,659 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | $19,287 | $5,624 |
Similar Demographics by Per Capita Income
Demographics Similar to Australians by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Russia ($52,044, a difference of 0.060%), Burmese ($52,005, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Norway ($52,217, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Greece ($51,891, a difference of 0.35%), and Estonian ($51,875, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Russians | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional $53,154 |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional $52,660 |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional $52,649 |
| Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional $52,596 |
| Immigrants | Austria | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional $52,503 |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional $52,391 |
| Immigrants | Norway | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional $52,217 |
| Australians | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional $52,074 |
| Immigrants | Russia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional $52,044 |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional $52,005 |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional $51,891 |
| Estonians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional $51,875 |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional $51,770 |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional $51,731 |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional $51,671 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Bahamian ($36,427, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa ($36,631, a difference of 0.43%), Ute ($36,651, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Honduras ($36,665, a difference of 0.52%), and Fijian ($36,690, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Inupiat | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic $36,999 |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic $36,849 |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic $36,823 |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic $36,690 |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic $36,665 |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic $36,651 |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic $36,631 |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic $36,475 |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic $36,427 |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic $36,180 |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic $36,112 |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic $35,999 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic $35,922 |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic $35,897 |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic $35,720 |