Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Chickasaw
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Chickasaw
12.4%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
17.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,534,905 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,564,346 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 5.7%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.40% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 39.9% | 32.8% |
Range | 39.5% | 30.3% |
Mean | 16.0% | 15.0% |
Median | 14.9% | 14.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.0% | 17.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand and Chickasaw by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are South American (12.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Potawatomi (12.5%, a difference of 0.62%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (12.5%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Uruguay (12.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and Colombian (12.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Fijian (13.0%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from Armenia (13.0%, a difference of 0.62%), Immigrants from Albania (13.0%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants (13.0%, a difference of 0.73%), and Bermudan (13.0%, a difference of 0.99%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Immigrants | Thailand | 17.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 12.4% |
South Americans | 16.0 /100 | #207 | Poor 12.4% |
Potawatomi | 14.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 12.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 12.9 /100 | #209 | Poor 12.5% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 12.5% |
Colombians | 10.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 12.6% |
Malaysians | 8.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 12.7% |
Moroccans | 7.6 /100 | #213 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Africa | 7.6 /100 | #214 | Tragic 12.8% |
Native Hawaiians | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | South America | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 6.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 12.9% |
Hawaiians | 5.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 12.9% |
Bermudans | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Albania | 4.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 4.3 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.0% |
Fijians | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.0% |
Chickasaw | 3.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.1% |