Immigrants from Congo vs Carpatho Rusyn Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Carpatho Rusyn
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Carpatho Rusyns
59.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Congo vs Carpatho Rusyn Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,089,117 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 59.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,871,690 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.085 and weighted average of 61.1%, a difference of 3.1%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Congo | Carpatho Rusyn |
Minimum | 35.2% | 39.6% |
Maximum | 79.8% | 91.0% |
Range | 44.6% | 51.3% |
Mean | 58.9% | 61.2% |
Median | 59.0% | 61.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 56.1% | 55.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 62.2% | 66.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo and Carpatho Rusyns by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Immigrants from Zaire (59.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Senegalese (59.8%, a difference of 0.97%), Sudanese (60.0%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Senegal (60.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and Immigrants from Sudan (60.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (61.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (61.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Ethiopian (61.2%, a difference of 0.28%), German Russian (60.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Soviet Union (60.9%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.4% |
Cambodians | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 61.3% |
Immigrants | France | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 61.3% |
Ethiopians | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 61.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 61.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 61.1% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 61.1% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 60.9% |
Soviet Union | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 60.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 60.8% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 60.7% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 60.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 60.1% |
Sudanese | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 60.0% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 59.8% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 59.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 59.2% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 57.6% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 56.7% |