Swiss vs Carpatho Rusyn Disability
COMPARE
Swiss
Carpatho Rusyn
Disability
Disability Comparison
Swiss
Carpatho Rusyns
12.2%
DISABILITY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
DISABILITY
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Carpatho Rusyn Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,998,318 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.003 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,872,415 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.426 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 0.080%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swiss | Carpatho Rusyn |
Minimum | 2.7% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 40.6% | 34.3% |
Range | 37.9% | 32.4% |
Mean | 12.9% | 15.0% |
Median | 12.1% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 16.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Carpatho Rusyns by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Liberian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Indonesian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), British (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Basque (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and Guamanian/Chamorro (12.3%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Guamanian/Chamorro (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Subsaharan African (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), European (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Indonesian (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and Liberian (12.2%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.2% |
Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% |
Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% |
Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% |
Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% |
Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% |
British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% |
Basques | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.2% |
Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.2% |
Swiss | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.2% |
Indonesians | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.3% |
Europeans | 1.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.3% |
Bermudans | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.3% |
Belgians | 0.8 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.3% |
German Russians | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.3% |
Slovenes | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.4% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.4% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.4% |