Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Turkey Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,895,883 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.023. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Turkey. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Immigrants from Turkey.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,152 compared to $51,368, a difference of 27.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $107,258, a difference of 27.3%), and median family income ($93,748 compared to $118,325, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $52,503, a difference of 7.8%), median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $44,066, a difference of 14.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,615 compared to $66,672, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 43.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 38.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 7.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 22.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 37.4%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 30.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.47%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.98%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.15%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 50.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 49.8%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 30.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 22.8%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.4%).