South American Indian vs Chickasaw Family Households with Children
COMPARE
South American Indian
Chickasaw
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
South American Indians
Chickasaw
28.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Chickasaw Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,526,695 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.273 and weighted average of 28.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,673,787 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 0.91%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American Indian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 9.4% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 48.9% | 62.8% |
Range | 39.5% | 56.3% |
Mean | 27.5% | 27.4% |
Median | 26.7% | 27.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.1% | 22.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.9% | 30.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households with Children
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Arab (28.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Scandinavian (28.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Uganda | 97.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 97.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Tohono O'odham | 97.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Spaniards | 97.4 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Scandinavians | 97.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 97.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Arabs | 97.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 28.0% |
South American Indians | 96.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants | Africa | 96.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Pakistanis | 96.0 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 27.9% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 27.9% |
Central American Indians | 95.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 27.9% |
Zimbabweans | 95.6 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 27.9% |
Europeans | 95.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 27.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 93.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 27.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Liberia (28.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (28.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Panamanian (28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (28.3%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Syria | 99.8 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 99.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Liberians | 99.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 99.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 99.4 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chickasaw | 99.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Panamanians | 99.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 99.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Ute | 99.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chileans | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 98.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 98.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 28.1% |