South American Indian vs Chickasaw Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
South American Indian
Chickasaw
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
South American Indians
Chickasaw
10.9%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
83.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Chickasaw Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,539,388 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,666,878 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 47.7%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American Indian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 33.4% | 51.4% |
| Range | 31.7% | 49.5% |
| Mean | 13.4% | 23.7% |
| Median | 11.1% | 21.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 18.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.3% | 27.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 9.0% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Eritrea (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Arab (10.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Cameroon (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Syrian (11.0%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Costa Ricans | 91.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 91.3 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Australians | 90.7 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 90.6 /100 | #142 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 89.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Lithuanians | 88.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 85.6 /100 | #145 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 83.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 83.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Arabs | 82.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 81.1 /100 | #149 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Syrians | 79.8 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| New Zealanders | 79.3 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Ukrainians | 78.0 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 77.4 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Pima (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |