Guamanian/Chamorro vs Australian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Australian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Australians
8.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
70.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Australian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,696,459 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,715,583 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.241 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 26.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Australian |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.57% |
| Maximum | 12.1% | 22.8% |
| Range | 10.7% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 7.1% |
| Median | 5.0% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 4.3% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Belgian (8.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Afghan (8.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Korean (8.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Northern European (7.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and Hawaiian (8.0%, a difference of 0.75%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (10.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Indonesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
| New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
| South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |