Subsaharan African vs Australian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Australian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Australians
12.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
70.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Australian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,014,655 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,715,583 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.241 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 20.9%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Australian |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 0.57% |
| Maximum | 37.8% | 22.8% |
| Range | 35.0% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 14.2% | 7.1% |
| Median | 12.9% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 4.3% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (12.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Macedonian (12.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Switzerland (12.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and African (12.3%, a difference of 0.93%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 1.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Hondurans | 1.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Liberians | 1.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.1% |
| South American Indians | 0.9 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.8 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Macedonians | 0.7 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.6 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 0.6 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.5 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Africans | 0.4 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Israelis | 0.3 /100 | #266 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 0.3 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (10.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Indonesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
| New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
| South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |