Guamanian/Chamorro vs Sudanese No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Sudanese
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Sudanese
8.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Sudanese No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,696,459 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,072,180 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 23.3%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Sudanese |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 12.1% | 86.7% |
| Range | 10.7% | 86.3% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 10.6% |
| Median | 5.0% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 11.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 11.5% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Belgian (8.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Afghan (8.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Korean (8.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Northern European (7.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and Hawaiian (8.0%, a difference of 0.75%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |