Estonian vs Australian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Estonian
Australian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Estonians
Australians
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
70.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Estonian vs Australian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,433,435 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,715,583 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.241 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 2.9%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Estonian | Australian |
| Minimum | 0.84% | 0.57% |
| Maximum | 47.6% | 22.8% |
| Range | 46.8% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 7.1% |
| Median | 6.0% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.9% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Estonians and Australians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Tlingit-Haida (10.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Congo (10.1%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |