Central American Indian vs Australian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Australian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Central American Indians
Australians
13.3%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
281st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
70.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Australian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,699,526 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,715,583 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.241 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 32.2%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American Indian | Australian |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.57% |
Maximum | 28.3% | 22.8% |
Range | 26.9% | 22.2% |
Mean | 11.1% | 7.1% |
Median | 10.7% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.5% | 8.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 4.3% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Alsatian (13.2%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.5%, a difference of 1.5%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.6%, a difference of 1.5%), Mongolian (13.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (13.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Singapore | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.0% |
Aleuts | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.0% |
Mongolians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.1% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.2% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 13.6% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 13.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 13.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (10.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Indonesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |