Guamanian/Chamorro vs Australian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
 Australian
 Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Australians
17.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Australian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,888,944 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.764 and weighted average of 17.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,142,484 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 4.5%.
 
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Australian | 
| Minimum | 5.0% | 7.1% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 28.9% | 
| Range | 95.0% | 21.7% | 
| Mean | 19.8% | 16.1% | 
| Median | 17.5% | 15.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.4% | 13.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.5% | 17.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 4.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.1% | 4.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.9% | 4.3% | 
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Sierra Leonean (17.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belize (17.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Ethiopian (17.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Barbados (17.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Menominee (18.0%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability | 
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.6 /100 | #254 | Tragic 17.9% | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 17.9% | 
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 17.9% | 
| Mexican American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #257 | Tragic 17.9% | 
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 17.9% | 
| Ethiopians | 0.5 /100 | #259 | Tragic 17.9% | 
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 17.9% | 
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 0.5 /100 | #261 | Tragic 17.9% | 
| Sierra Leoneans | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 17.9% | 
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.4 /100 | #263 | Tragic 17.9% | 
| Menominee | 0.4 /100 | #264 | Tragic 18.0% | 
| Spanish Americans | 0.4 /100 | #265 | Tragic 18.0% | 
| Belizeans | 0.4 /100 | #266 | Tragic 18.0% | 
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #267 | Tragic 18.0% | 
| Cherokee | 0.3 /100 | #268 | Tragic 18.0% | 
Demographics Similar to Australians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are American (17.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Yugoslavian (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Switzerland (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and Celtic (17.1%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability | 
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% | 
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% | 
| Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% | 
| Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% | 
| Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% | 
| Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% | 
| Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% | 
| Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% | 
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% | 
| Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% | 
| Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167 | Good 17.2% |