Immigrants from Moldova vs Australian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Moldova
Australian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Moldova
Australians
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
70.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Moldova vs Australian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,267,195 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,715,583 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.241 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 3.0%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Moldova | Australian |
| Minimum | 0.71% | 0.57% |
| Maximum | 24.5% | 22.8% |
| Range | 23.8% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 7.3% | 7.1% |
| Median | 6.2% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Moldova and Australians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Moldova are Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Tlingit-Haida (10.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Congo (10.1%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |