Austrian vs Australian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Austrian
Australian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Austrians
Australians
8.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
70.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Austrian vs Australian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,345,618 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,715,583 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.241 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 14.4%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Austrian | Australian |
| Minimum | 0.94% | 0.57% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 22.8% |
| Range | 99.1% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 14.5% | 7.1% |
| Median | 7.9% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.4% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.1% | 4.3% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Austrians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Austrians are Potawatomi (8.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Bolivia (8.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from North America (8.7%, a difference of 0.95%), Immigrants from Central America (8.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from Canada (8.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Potawatomi | 98.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 98.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Slavs | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Bulgarians | 98.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Asians | 98.3 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Pakistanis | 98.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (10.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Indonesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
| New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
| South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |