Portuguese vs Slavic Male Poverty
COMPARE
Portuguese
Slavic
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Portuguese
Slavs
10.6%
MALE POVERTY
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
91.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese vs Slavic Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,699,764 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,742,219 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.590 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 0.22%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Portuguese | Slavic |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.066% |
Maximum | 31.5% | 41.3% |
Range | 30.0% | 41.2% |
Mean | 10.9% | 11.9% |
Median | 9.6% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 13.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Portuguese and Slavs by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Laotian (10.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Albanian (10.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Argentineans | 90.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 89.8 /100 | #111 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 89.5 /100 | #112 | Excellent 10.6% |
Palestinians | 89.1 /100 | #113 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 89.0 /100 | #114 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 88.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 10.6% |