Iroquois vs Central American Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Central American
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Iroquois
Central Americans
14.5%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Central American Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,260,268 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.624 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,069,914 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 0.33%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Central American |
Minimum | 3.3% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 62.9% |
Range | 96.7% | 61.2% |
Mean | 21.2% | 17.4% |
Median | 15.1% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.6% | 19.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.3% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.5% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.3% | 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Central Americans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Guyanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Guyana (14.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (14.4%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.58%), Chickasaw (14.7%, a difference of 0.63%), and Guyanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.65%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |