Filipino vs Scotch-Irish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Filipino
 Scotch-Irish
 Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Filipinos
Scotch-Irish
10.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Scotch-Irish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,106,597 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,935,242 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 21.3%.
 
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Filipino | Scotch-Irish | 
| Minimum | 2.2% | 2.6% | 
| Maximum | 18.6% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 16.4% | 97.4% | 
| Mean | 8.5% | 19.2% | 
| Median | 8.9% | 14.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 12.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 21.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 8.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 14.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 14.8% | 
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Filipinos by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (11.0%, a difference of 0.75%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (11.1%, a difference of 1.5%), Bulgarian (11.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty | 
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% | 
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% | 
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% | 
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% | 
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% | 
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% | 
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% | 
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% | 
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% | 
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% | 
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% | 
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty | 
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% | 
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% | 
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% | 
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% | 
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% | 
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% | 
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% | 
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% | 
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% | 
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% | 
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% | 
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% | 
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |