Immigrants from Cuba vs Scotch-Irish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Scotch-Irish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Scotch-Irish
16.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Scotch-Irish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,939,480 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,935,242 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 21.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Scotch-Irish |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 33.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 29.5% | 97.4% |
| Mean | 16.4% | 19.2% |
| Median | 15.0% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 21.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 14.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 14.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Spanish American (16.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Haiti (16.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Comanche (16.2%, a difference of 0.13%), West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Vietnamese (16.1%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 16.4% |
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |