Yugoslavian vs Scotch-Irish Male Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Scotch-Irish
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
Scotch-Irish
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
78.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
63.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Scotch-Irish Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,576,958 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,595,685 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.718 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 1.8%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | Scotch-Irish |
| Minimum | 0.59% | 3.2% |
| Maximum | 26.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 25.6% | 96.8% |
| Mean | 9.3% | 20.1% |
| Median | 8.9% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 25.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 14.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 16.4% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Scotch-Irish by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from France (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Basque (10.9%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Costa Rican (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (11.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Venezuelan (11.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |