Immigrants from Caribbean vs Scotch-Irish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Caribbean
Scotch-Irish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Caribbean
Scotch-Irish
16.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Caribbean vs Scotch-Irish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,490,616 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.060 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,935,242 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 27.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Caribbean | Scotch-Irish |
| Minimum | 5.4% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 27.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 22.4% | 97.4% |
| Mean | 16.9% | 19.2% |
| Median | 16.6% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.0% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.4% | 21.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 14.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 14.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Caribbean by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Caribbean are Seminole (16.9%, a difference of 0.12%), African (16.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Grenada (16.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |