Alaskan Athabascan vs Scotch-Irish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Scotch-Irish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Scotch-Irish
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Scotch-Irish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,807,044 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,935,242 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 8.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Scotch-Irish |
| Minimum | 0.78% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 69.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 68.2% | 97.4% |
| Mean | 21.7% | 19.2% |
| Median | 15.9% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.2% | 21.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.9% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.4% | 14.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.3% | 14.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |