Welsh vs Hmong Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Welsh
Hmong
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Welsh
Hmong
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Welsh vs Hmong Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 518,114,778 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.804 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,678,157 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.313 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 15.0%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Welsh | Hmong |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 10.7% |
| Range | 96.7% | 10.2% |
| Mean | 13.6% | 4.7% |
| Median | 6.3% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.5% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.3% | 2.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Welsh by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Austrian (4.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Hmong by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Immigrants from Egypt (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from China (5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Portugal (5.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and German Russian (5.0%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
| Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
| German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
| Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
| Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |