New Zealander vs Hmong Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
New Zealander
Hmong
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
New Zealanders
Hmong
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Hmong Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,591,527 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368 and weighted average of 4.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,678,157 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.313 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 11.9%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | New Zealander | Hmong |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 11.9% | 10.7% |
Range | 10.8% | 10.2% |
Mean | 4.4% | 4.7% |
Median | 3.8% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 6.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 2.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Slavic (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Canada (4.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Serbia (4.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Korea (4.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Macedonian (4.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Slavs | 99.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.4% |
New Zealanders | 99.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | North America | 99.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | England | 99.3 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Ukrainians | 99.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.2 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Cambodians | 99.2 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.1 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Hmong by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Immigrants from Egypt (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from China (5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Portugal (5.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and German Russian (5.0%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |