Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Hmong Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,293,901 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,678,157 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.313 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 2.9%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina	Hmong
Minimum	0.92%	0.50%
Maximum	15.1%	10.7%
Range	14.1%	10.2%
Mean	4.8%	4.7%
Median	3.9%	4.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	2.3%	3.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.1%	6.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.7%	3.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.5%	2.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.5%	2.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Hmong by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Romanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Egyptian (4.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Palestinian (4.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (4.9%, a difference of 0.74%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Immigrants from Egypt (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from China (5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Portugal (5.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and German Russian (5.0%, a difference of 0.43%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Romanians	92.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	92.5 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Asia	92.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 4.8%
Egyptians	92.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 4.8%
Palestinians	91.2 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	90.7 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 4.9%
Soviet Union	90.7 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	90.5 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 4.9%
Puget Sound Salish	90.4 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Kenya	90.2 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 4.9%
Samoans	90.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 4.9%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	89.4 /100 \| #135	Excellent 4.9%
Immigrants \| Hungary	88.7 /100 \| #136	Excellent 4.9%
Guamanians/Chamorros	86.5 /100 \| #137	Excellent 4.9%
Chileans	86.0 /100 \| #138	Excellent 4.9%
German Russians	85.1 /100 \| #139	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Portugal	84.8 /100 \| #140	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Brazil	84.6 /100 \| #141	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| China	84.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Egypt	83.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 5.0%
Hmong	83.2 /100 \| #144	Excellent 5.0%