Welsh vs Hmong Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Welsh
Hmong
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Welsh
Hmong
4.7%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Welsh vs Hmong Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 519,058,145 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.865 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,652,438 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.153 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 7.5%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Welsh | Hmong |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 75.0% | 10.0% |
| Range | 72.2% | 9.0% |
| Mean | 14.8% | 5.1% |
| Median | 6.5% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.5% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.5% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.8% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.7% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Welsh and Hmong by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Scottish (4.7%, a difference of 0.21%), European (4.7%, a difference of 0.76%), Fijian (4.7%, a difference of 0.78%), Bulgarian (4.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and Polish (4.7%, a difference of 0.87%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Danish (4.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Swedish (4.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Chinese (4.5%, a difference of 2.0%), German (4.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and Slovene (4.5%, a difference of 2.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Belgians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Finns | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| English | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Poles | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Welsh | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.7% |