Welsh vs French Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Welsh
French
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Welsh
French
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Welsh vs French Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 518,114,778 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.804 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 557,631,168 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of French and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 0.29%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Welsh | French |
Minimum | 3.3% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 28.3% |
Range | 96.7% | 26.7% |
Mean | 13.6% | 6.3% |
Median | 6.3% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 6.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.5% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.3% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Welsh and French by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Austrian (4.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French are Austrian (4.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Netherlands (4.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Czechoslovakian (4.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |