Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from China Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,634,387 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.103 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,197,331 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.601 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 25.7%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Trinidadian and Tobagonian	Immigrants from China
Minimum	0.75%	1.1%
Maximum	14.6%	20.0%
Range	13.9%	18.9%
Mean	6.3%	5.8%
Median	5.6%	4.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.3%	3.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.8%	6.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.4%	2.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.0%	3.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.0%	3.7%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Immigrants from Bahamas (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jamaica (6.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from West Indies (6.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and Colville (6.3%, a difference of 0.78%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Blackfeet	0.2 /100 \| #265	Tragic 6.2%
Creek	0.2 /100 \| #266	Tragic 6.2%
Spanish Americans	0.2 /100 \| #267	Tragic 6.2%
Alaska Natives	0.2 /100 \| #268	Tragic 6.2%
Immigrants \| West Indies	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 6.2%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #270	Tragic 6.2%
Immigrants \| Bahamas	0.1 /100 \| #271	Tragic 6.2%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.1 /100 \| #272	Tragic 6.2%
Colville	0.1 /100 \| #273	Tragic 6.3%
Barbadians	0.1 /100 \| #274	Tragic 6.3%
Choctaw	0.1 /100 \| #275	Tragic 6.3%
Yaqui	0.1 /100 \| #276	Tragic 6.3%
Indonesians	0.1 /100 \| #277	Tragic 6.3%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.1 /100 \| #278	Tragic 6.4%
Houma	0.0 /100 \| #279	Tragic 6.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Brazil (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Portugal (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), German Russian (5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Hmong (5.0%, a difference of 0.32%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	89.4 /100 \| #135	Excellent 4.9%
Immigrants \| Hungary	88.7 /100 \| #136	Excellent 4.9%
Guamanians/Chamorros	86.5 /100 \| #137	Excellent 4.9%
Chileans	86.0 /100 \| #138	Excellent 4.9%
German Russians	85.1 /100 \| #139	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Portugal	84.8 /100 \| #140	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Brazil	84.6 /100 \| #141	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| China	84.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Egypt	83.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 5.0%
Hmong	83.2 /100 \| #144	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Spain	79.9 /100 \| #145	Good 5.0%
Mongolians	79.8 /100 \| #146	Good 5.0%
Syrians	78.7 /100 \| #147	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Russia	78.7 /100 \| #148	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Oceania	78.6 /100 \| #149	Good 5.0%