Celtic vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,973,280 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.945 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 466,887,426 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.324 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 10.9%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Celtic	Immigrants from South Central Asia
Minimum	1.3%	0.66%
Maximum	100.0%	12.4%
Range	98.7%	11.8%
Mean	8.7%	3.6%
Median	5.4%	3.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.1%	2.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	9.4%	4.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.4%	1.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.2%	1.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.1%	1.8%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Celtics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Taiwanese (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Philippines (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Indonesia (4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	96.4 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	96.2 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 4.7%
Pakistanis	96.2 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 4.7%
Tongans	95.9 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Nepal	95.9 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	95.1 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 4.8%
Taiwanese	94.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 4.8%
Celtics	94.8 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 4.8%
Kenyans	94.7 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.6 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.0 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	93.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 4.8%
Indians (Asian)	93.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 4.8%
Whites/Caucasians	93.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 4.8%
Jordanians	93.1 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.070%), British (4.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Serbian (4.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Japan (4.3%, a difference of 0.16%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
French Canadians	99.8 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 4.2%
Northern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 4.3%
Scottish	99.8 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 4.3%
Swiss	99.8 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.8 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 4.3%
Serbians	99.8 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 4.3%
British	99.8 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	99.8 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 4.3%
Australians	99.7 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 4.3%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 4.3%
Burmese	99.7 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.7 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 4.3%
Russians	99.7 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 4.3%
Welsh	99.7 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 4.3%
Austrians	99.7 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 4.3%