Scotch-Irish vs Afghan Poverty
COMPARE
Scotch-Irish
 Afghan
 Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Scotch-Irish
Afghans
12.2%
POVERTY
62.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.0%
POVERTY
74.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scotch-Irish vs Afghan Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 548,217,294 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,816,997 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 12.0%, a difference of 1.4%.
 
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scotch-Irish | Afghan | 
| Minimum | 1.8% | 0.81% | 
| Maximum | 63.9% | 30.8% | 
| Range | 62.1% | 30.0% | 
| Mean | 16.7% | 12.1% | 
| Median | 12.9% | 10.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 8.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.0% | 14.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 6.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 5.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 5.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish and Afghans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Costa Rican (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Taiwanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Guamanian/Chamorro (12.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (12.1%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Syrian (12.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Germany (12.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Malaysia (12.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.0%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty | 
| Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141  | Excellent 11.9%  | 
| Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142  | Excellent 11.9%  | 
| Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143  | Good 11.9%  | 
| Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144  | Good 11.9%  | 
| Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145  | Good 12.0%  | 
| Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146  | Good 12.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147  | Good 12.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148  | Good 12.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149  | Good 12.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150  | Good 12.0%  | 
| Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151  | Good 12.0%  | 
| Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152  | Good 12.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153  | Good 12.1%  | 
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154  | Good 12.1%  | 
| Hungarians | 63.6 /100 | #155  | Good 12.2%  | 
| Scotch-Irish | 62.6 /100 | #156  | Good 12.2%  | 
| Costa Ricans | 62.2 /100 | #157  | Good 12.2%  | 
| Taiwanese | 61.8 /100 | #158  | Good 12.2%  | 
| Pennsylvania Germans | 60.8 /100 | #159  | Good 12.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Nepal | 60.4 /100 | #160  | Good 12.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Fiji | 59.1 /100 | #161  | Average 12.2%  |