Scotch-Irish vs Brazilian Poverty
COMPARE
Scotch-Irish
Brazilian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Scotch-Irish
Brazilians
12.2%
POVERTY
62.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
POVERTY
79.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scotch-Irish vs Brazilian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 548,217,294 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,736,461 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 2.1%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scotch-Irish | Brazilian |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 63.9% | 33.9% |
| Range | 62.1% | 31.8% |
| Mean | 16.7% | 11.7% |
| Median | 12.9% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.0% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish and Brazilians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Costa Rican (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Taiwanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Guamanian/Chamorro (12.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (12.1%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Basque (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from France (11.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Peru (11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Icelander (11.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Pakistani (11.9%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Pakistanis | 82.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 81.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
| Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
| Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
| Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
| Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
| Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
| Hungarians | 63.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.2% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.6 /100 | #156 | Good 12.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 62.2 /100 | #157 | Good 12.2% |
| Taiwanese | 61.8 /100 | #158 | Good 12.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 60.8 /100 | #159 | Good 12.2% |