Basque vs Afghan Poverty
COMPARE
Basque
Afghan
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Basques
Afghans
11.9%
POVERTY
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.0%
POVERTY
74.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Basque vs Afghan Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,732,403 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Basques and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,816,997 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 12.0%, a difference of 0.80%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Basque | Afghan |
Minimum | 0.59% | 0.81% |
Maximum | 36.5% | 30.8% |
Range | 35.9% | 30.0% |
Mean | 12.3% | 12.1% |
Median | 11.1% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 14.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Basques and Afghans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Basques are Immigrants from France (11.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Peru (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Brazilian (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Pakistani (11.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Jordan (11.9%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Syrian (12.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Germany (12.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Malaysia (12.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.0%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Yugoslavians | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 85.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.8% |
Chileans | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 83.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 82.4 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.9% |
Pakistanis | 82.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 81.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |
Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |