Cambodian vs Czechoslovakian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cambodian
Czechoslovakian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Cambodians
Czechoslovakians
4.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cambodian vs Czechoslovakian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,246,579 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.343 and weighted average of 4.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 364,959,932 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 3.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cambodian | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 10.6% | 21.7% |
| Range | 9.1% | 20.4% |
| Mean | 4.4% | 6.9% |
| Median | 3.7% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.1% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Cambodians and Czechoslovakians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cambodians are Immigrants from South Africa (4.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Austria (4.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Ukrainian (4.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from England (4.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from North America (4.5%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Netherlands (4.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Sweden (4.4%, a difference of 0.55%), Tlingit-Haida (4.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and Okinawan (4.4%, a difference of 0.73%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Slavs | 99.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| New Zealanders | 99.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.3 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Ukrainians | 99.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.2 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Cambodians | 99.2 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.1 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 4.5% |