Swedish vs Czechoslovakian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Swedish
Czechoslovakian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Swedes
Czechoslovakians
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Czechoslovakian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 527,096,192 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.622 and weighted average of 3.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 364,959,932 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 12.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swedish | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 0.65% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 87.5% | 21.7% |
| Range | 86.9% | 20.4% |
| Mean | 7.1% | 6.9% |
| Median | 3.4% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.3% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.7% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.5% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Swedes by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 0.61%), Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Netherlands (4.3%, a difference of 0.090%), French (4.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Austrian (4.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |