Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Chickasaw
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Yugoslavians
Chickasaw
10.7%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
92.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,227,567 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,564,346 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 22.3%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 21.2% | 32.8% |
| Range | 18.9% | 30.3% |
| Mean | 9.2% | 15.0% |
| Median | 8.6% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.7% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Receiving Food Stamps
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Jordan (10.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Afghan (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and French (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Sri Lankans | 93.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 93.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Ukrainians | 92.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Afghans | 92.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 92.6 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 92.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Yugoslavians | 92.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Israelis | 92.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| French | 92.3 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 92.0 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 90.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 90.3 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Argentineans | 90.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Slovaks | 89.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Nigerian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Puget Sound Salish (13.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (13.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Bermudans | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 4.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 4.3 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Fijians | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Chickasaw | 3.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Nigerians | 3.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Panamanians | 3.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 3.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 3.4 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 3.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Salvadorans | 2.7 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Cherokee | 2.5 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.2% |