Slovene vs Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Slovene
Chickasaw
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Slovenes
Chickasaw
9.8%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slovene vs Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 260,914,869 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.136 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,564,346 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 33.4%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slovene | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 26.6% | 32.8% |
| Range | 25.1% | 30.3% |
| Mean | 9.4% | 15.0% |
| Median | 8.8% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Receiving Food Stamps
Demographics Similar to Slovenes by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Immigrants from Indonesia (9.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Turkey (9.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Northern European (9.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from North America (9.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and Italian (9.9%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| British | 99.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Germans | 99.2 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| English | 99.2 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.2 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Chinese | 99.2 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.2 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.1 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Slovenes | 99.1 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.0 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Italians | 99.0 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Scottish | 98.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 98.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Macedonians | 98.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Nigerian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Puget Sound Salish (13.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (13.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Bermudans | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 4.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 4.3 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Fijians | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Chickasaw | 3.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Nigerians | 3.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Panamanians | 3.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 3.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 3.4 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 3.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Salvadorans | 2.7 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Cherokee | 2.5 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.2% |