Puget Sound Salish vs Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Puget Sound Salish
Chickasaw
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Puget Sound Salish
Chickasaw
13.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
3.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puget Sound Salish vs Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,113,592 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,564,346 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 0.12%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Puget Sound Salish | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 31.1% | 32.8% |
| Range | 28.7% | 30.3% |
| Mean | 14.6% | 15.0% |
| Median | 12.5% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.3% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish and Chickasaw by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Nigeria (13.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Nigerian (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Fijian (13.0%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Nigerian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Nigeria (13.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Fijian (13.0%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Hawaiians | 5.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Bermudans | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 4.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 4.3 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Fijians | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Chickasaw | 3.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Nigerians | 3.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Panamanians | 3.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 3.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 3.4 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 3.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Salvadorans | 2.7 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Cherokee | 2.5 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Comanche | 2.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 1.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Crow | 1.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.5% |
| French American Indians | 1.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.5% |