Romanian vs Soviet Union Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Romanian
Soviet Union
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Romanians
Soviet Union
10.4%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Soviet Union Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 376,766,958 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,471,584 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 6.0%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Romanian | Soviet Union |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 59.0% | 20.3% |
Range | 58.0% | 18.4% |
Mean | 15.1% | 8.3% |
Median | 11.1% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.4% | 11.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 4.6% |
Similar Demographics by Receiving Food Stamps
Demographics Similar to Romanians by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Mongolian (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Pakistani (10.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Pakistan (10.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Icelander (10.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and Carpatho Rusyn (10.4%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Immigrants | Hungary | 96.7 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 96.5 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Italy | 96.4 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Koreans | 96.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 96.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.2 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Pakistanis | 95.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Romanians | 95.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Mongolians | 95.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Icelanders | 95.4 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 95.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 94.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Canadians | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 94.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 94.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Brazilian (11.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (11.1%, a difference of 0.040%), White/Caucasian (11.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 86.0 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.0% |
Syrians | 85.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 11.0% |
Hungarians | 85.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 11.0% |
Taiwanese | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 11.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 83.9 /100 | #147 | Excellent 11.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 11.1% |
Brazilians | 83.2 /100 | #149 | Excellent 11.1% |
Soviet Union | 83.1 /100 | #150 | Excellent 11.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 81.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 11.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 81.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 11.1% |
Lebanese | 81.6 /100 | #153 | Excellent 11.1% |
Armenians | 81.4 /100 | #154 | Excellent 11.1% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 80.4 /100 | #155 | Excellent 11.2% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 75.6 /100 | #156 | Good 11.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.2 /100 | #157 | Good 11.3% |