Ottawa vs Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Ottawa
Chickasaw
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Ottawa
Chickasaw
13.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
3.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ottawa vs Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,940,459 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.308 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,564,346 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 0.070%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ottawa | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 30.4% | 32.8% |
| Range | 27.6% | 30.3% |
| Mean | 13.1% | 15.0% |
| Median | 12.8% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.9% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ottawa and Chickasaw by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Nigerian (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Puget Sound Salish (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nigeria (13.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Fijian (13.0%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Nigerian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Puget Sound Salish (13.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Nigeria (13.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Fijian (13.0%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 6.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Hawaiians | 5.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Bermudans | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 4.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 4.3 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Fijians | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Chickasaw | 3.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Nigerians | 3.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Panamanians | 3.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 3.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 3.4 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 3.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Salvadorans | 2.7 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Cherokee | 2.5 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Comanche | 2.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 1.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Crow | 1.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.5% |