Marshallese vs Chilean Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Marshallese
Chilean
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Marshallese
Chileans
5.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
47.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
86.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Chilean Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,723,885 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 255,436,750 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 5.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Marshallese | Chilean |
Minimum | 1.00% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 7.2% | 14.3% |
Range | 6.2% | 13.2% |
Mean | 4.8% | 5.3% |
Median | 4.9% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 6.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 2.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Marshallese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Menominee (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.2%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Ukraine (5.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and Alsatian (5.2%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 51.3 /100 | #172 | Average 5.2% |
Alsatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.2% |
Marshallese | 47.9 /100 | #175 | Average 5.2% |
Menominee | 47.8 /100 | #176 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 45.1 /100 | #177 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 5.2% |
Spanish | 41.4 /100 | #179 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 39.3 /100 | #180 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 38.8 /100 | #181 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 37.7 /100 | #182 | Fair 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Guamanian/Chamorro (4.9%, a difference of 0.13%), German Russian (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Portugal (5.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from China (5.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 90.5 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.4 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 90.2 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Samoans | 90.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 89.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 4.9% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #136 | Excellent 4.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |