Alaska Native vs Chilean Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Alaska Native
Chilean
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Alaska Natives
Chileans
6.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
86.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaska Native vs Chilean Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,597,225 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.598 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 255,436,750 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 25.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaska Native | Chilean |
Minimum | 1.6% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 14.3% |
Range | 98.4% | 13.2% |
Mean | 18.9% | 5.3% |
Median | 10.2% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.9% | 6.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.6% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.2% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.9% | 2.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Alaska Natives by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaska Natives are Immigrants from West Indies (6.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Jamaica (6.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Bahamas (6.2%, a difference of 0.43%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (6.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and Spanish American (6.2%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Senegalese | 0.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.1% |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.2% |
Creek | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Guamanian/Chamorro (4.9%, a difference of 0.13%), German Russian (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Portugal (5.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from China (5.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 90.5 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.4 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 90.2 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Samoans | 90.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 89.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 4.9% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #136 | Excellent 4.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |