Marshallese vs Mongolian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Marshallese
Mongolian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Marshallese
Mongolians
5.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
47.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Mongolian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,723,885 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,875,395 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 4.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Marshallese | Mongolian |
| Minimum | 1.00% | 0.35% |
| Maximum | 7.2% | 14.5% |
| Range | 6.2% | 14.1% |
| Mean | 4.8% | 5.0% |
| Median | 4.9% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Marshallese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Menominee (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.2%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Ukraine (5.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and Alsatian (5.2%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
| Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
| Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 51.3 /100 | #172 | Average 5.2% |
| Alsatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.2% |
| Marshallese | 47.9 /100 | #175 | Average 5.2% |
| Menominee | 47.8 /100 | #176 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 45.1 /100 | #177 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 5.2% |
| Spanish | 41.4 /100 | #179 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 39.3 /100 | #180 | Fair 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 38.8 /100 | #181 | Fair 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 37.7 /100 | #182 | Fair 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Immigrants from Spain (5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
| Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
| Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
| Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |